Socioeconomic Differences in the Impact of Smoking Tobacco and Alcohol Prices on Smoking in India

36 Pages Posted: 4 Nov 2011 Last revised: 16 Jul 2023

See all articles by G. Emmanuel Guindon

G. Emmanuel Guindon

McMaster University - Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA)

Arindam Nandi

The Population Council; One Health Trust

Frank J. Chaloupka

University of Illinois at Chicago - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Prabhat Jha

University of Toronto - Saint Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto - Centre for Global Health Research

Date Written: November 2011

Abstract

The threat posed by smoking to health in India is severe. Already 1 in 5 of all adult male deaths and 1 in 20 of all adult female deaths at ages 30-69 are due to smoking and India will soon have 1 million smoking deaths a year. Increasing tobacco prices has been found to be the single most effective method to reduce smoking. Yet, bidis, the most common form of smoked tobacco in India, are largely untaxed, while cigarettes are taxed at about 40% of retail price, well below the 65-80% rate noted by the World Bank in countries with effective tobacco control policies. Moreover, low and stagnant tax rates have occurred in a period in which all tobacco products have become more affordable with income growth. First, we use data from the most recent three consecutive quinquennial National Sample Survey (NSS) rounds (NSS 50, 55 and 61 conducted in 1993/94, 1999/00 and 200/05) and a two-equation system of budget shares and unit values that attempts to correct for quality and measurement error. Second, we pool data from the most recent nine rounds of NSS (NSS 55-57, 59-64, conducted between 1999/00 to 2007/08). Our analyses of single and repeated cross-sections yield own-price elasticity for bidis that are roughly in keeping with existing evidence. We find that a 10% increase in bidi prices would reduce the demand for bidis by about 6 to 9.5%. We find, however, that own-price elasticity for cigarettes in India is substantially larger than previously thought. Our estimates suggest that cigarette users are at least as responsive as bidi users to price changes. On the whole, our analyses suggest that low SES households are likely more responsive to price changes than high SES households. Our analyses also uncovers important and policy-relevant cross-prices effects. Findings from this study provide additional evidence of the effectiveness of tobacco prices at reducing tobacco use.

Suggested Citation

Guindon, G. Emmanuel and Nandi, Arindam and Chaloupka, Frank J. and Jha, Prabhat, Socioeconomic Differences in the Impact of Smoking Tobacco and Alcohol Prices on Smoking in India (November 2011). NBER Working Paper No. w17580, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1954506

G. Emmanuel Guindon (Contact Author)

McMaster University - Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA) ( email )

Canada

Arindam Nandi

The Population Council ( email )

New York, NY
United States

One Health Trust ( email )

5636 Connecticut Avenue NW,
PO Box 42735
Washington DC, DC 20015
United States

Frank J. Chaloupka

University of Illinois at Chicago - Department of Economics ( email )

m/c 144 601 South Morgan St., Room 2103
Chicago, IL 60607-7121
United States
312-413-2367 (Phone)
312-996-3344 (Fax)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Prabhat Jha

University of Toronto - Saint Michael's Hospital ( email )

Toronto
Canada

University of Toronto - Centre for Global Health Research ( email )

Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
39
Abstract Views
553
PlumX Metrics