Citations (1)



Enemy Combatants and the Writ of Habeas Corpus

Steven R. Swanson

Hamline University - School of Law

November 6, 2011

Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 35, p. 939, 2003

Prior to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States treated international terrorism problems as primarily a criminal law concern. This article analyzes the legal arguments under U.S. national security law for indefinite detention of enemy combatants. It begins by reviewing the facts surrounding the enemy combatants’ imprisonment. It briefly discusses the history of the writ of habeas corpus and then examines international law, which might provide detainees with their only available remedy. Next, this article will review U.S. Supreme Court cases dealing with military power to imprison people during national emergencies. Finally, it will analyze recent decisions relating to detainees in light of this Supreme Court authority and international law. Ultimately, Guantanamo may not be the best policy and may be subject to challenge under international law, domestic law appears to justify unlimited detention. U.S. citizens, on the other hand, deserve – and receive – greater protections under the Constitution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Keywords: International terrorism, criminal law, detainees, al Qaeda, Taliban, Guantanamo, enemy combatants, international law, habeas corpus, domestic law, 9/11, September 11

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 17, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Swanson, Steven R., Enemy Combatants and the Writ of Habeas Corpus (November 6, 2011). Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 35, p. 939, 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1955569

Contact Information

Steven R. Swanson (Contact Author)
Hamline University - School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 717
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 223,967
Citations:  1