Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, p. 333, 1990
33 Pages Posted: 17 Nov 2011
Date Written: January 1, 1990
The massive expansion of global contacts in the twentieth century has mandated the creation of dispute resolution mechanisms for international business conflicts. This article traces the development of the comity doctrine by examining the three Conventions and the cases which interpret them. It first offers a brief historical background of the problems faced by international litigators prior to the existence of international dispute resolution mechanisms, and then examines how the three Conventions addressed these problems. The article next looks at the Supreme Court cases that challenged each Convention. It then criticizes the Supreme Court’s lack of analytical consistency in deciding these cases, and goes on to discuss the advantages of the comity doctrine, ultimately applying the doctrine to each of the cases as the author believes the Supreme Court should have applied it. It is hoped that this study will assist the courts in creating a healthier environment for the further development of international dispute resolution mechanisms.
Keywords: Comity doctrine, Conventions, international dispute resolution, international law, United Nations Convention, Hague Convention
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Swanson, Steven R., Comity, International Dispute Resolution Agreements, and the Supreme Court (January 1, 1990). Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, p. 333, 1990. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1955652