Download This PaperQuery Theory: Knowing What We Want by Arguing with Ourselves
Behavior and Brain Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2, p. 91, 2011
2 Pages Posted: 9 Nov 2011
There are 2 versions of this paper
Query Theory: Knowing What We Want by Arguing with Ourselves
Date Written: 2011
Abstract
Mercier and Sperber (M&S) argue that reasoning is social and argumentative, and that this explains many apparently irrational judgment phenomena. We look at the relationship between interpersonal and intrapersonal argumentation and discuss parallels and differences from the perspective of query theory, a memory-based model of constructive preferences. We suggest an important goal is to integrate models across inference and preference.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Culture and Individual Judgment and Decision Making
By Elke U. Weber and Christopher K. Hsee
-
Asymmetric Discounting in Intertemporal Choice: A Query Theory Account
By Elke U. Weber, Eric J. Johnson, ...
-
Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction
By Eric J. Johnson, Gerald Häubl, ...
-
Mindful Judgment and Decision Making
By Elke U. Weber and Eric J. Johnson
-
Affect, Risk, and Decision Making
By Paul Slovic, Ellen Peters, ...
-
Constructing Preferences from Memory
By Elke U. Weber and Eric J. Johnson
-
Making Better Decisions: From Measuring to Constructing Preferences
By Eric J. Johnson, Mary Steffel, ...
-
Culture and Judgment and Decision Making: The Constructivist Turn
By Elke U. Weber and Michael Morris