47 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2011 Last revised: 26 Mar 2012
Date Written: February 28, 2012
This article examines the increasingly common phenomenon of "scholars' briefs" in which collections of law professors appear as amici curiae in litigation before a court. Arguing that many professors compromise their integrity by joining such briefs too promiscuously, the article proposes standards that professors should insist upon before signing amicus briefs that they do not write. The article's methodology involves comparisons among various roles that law professors sometimes play and the distinctive moral and ethical standards appropriate to each. Besides a thorough discussion of scholars' briefs, the article includes broader analysis of law professors' role-based ethical obligations.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Fallon, Richard H., Scholars' Briefs and the Vocation of a Law Professor (February 28, 2012). The Journal of Legal Analysis, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1959936 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1959936