Delegated Acts, Implementing Acts and the New Comitology Regulation

European Law Review, Vol. 36, p. 671, October 2011

Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 58/2011

19 Pages Posted: 15 Nov 2011

See all articles by Paul P. Craig

Paul P. Craig

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: October 1, 2011

Abstract

A common problem faced by legal systems is how to legitimate and render accountable norms of a legislative nature made pursuant to primary legislative acts. The European Union is no different in this respect. The hierarchy of norms was central to the Lisbon Treaty reforms. This hierarchy is crucially dependent on the divide between delegated and implementing acts, since differing regimes of oversight and accountability apply to the two types of act. The first half of this article is concerned with the tenability of this divide and it is argued that there are five problems with the Lisbon dichotomy. The focus then shifts to analysis of the new Comitology Regulation that applies to implementing acts as governed by Article 291 TFEU. The difficulties with the new regime will be highlighted and the official orthodoxy to the effect that the new Regulation simplifies the previous rules will be questioned.

Keywords: delegated acts, implementing acts, Comitology, hierarchy of norms

Suggested Citation

Craig, Paul P., Delegated Acts, Implementing Acts and the New Comitology Regulation (October 1, 2011). European Law Review, Vol. 36, p. 671, October 2011; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 58/2011 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1959987

Paul P. Craig (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,403
Abstract Views
3,749
rank
13,062
PlumX Metrics