Kisses vs. Shocks: Contemplation Asymmetries (Partly) Explain Why Negative Events are Discounted Less than Positive Events

47 Pages Posted: 19 Nov 2011 Last revised: 3 Jul 2019

See all articles by David J. Hardisty

David J. Hardisty

Sauder School of Business

Elke U. Weber

Princeton University - Department of Psychology

Date Written: July 1, 2019

Abstract

Consumers discount future positives more the future negatives, the so-called “sign effect”. This happens partly because the contemplation of future negative events is more impactful than the contemplation future positive events, even after controlling for loss aversion. Thinking about a future positive event is a mixed emotional experience that is both pleasurable and painful, whereas thinking about a future negative event is a more unidimensionally painful experience. Contemplation utility partly determines time preference, such that the more people enjoy contemplating an event, the more they prefer to delay it, and vice versa. In combination, these findings partly explain the sign effect in intertemporal choice and offer unique insights for nudging consumers to care more about future outcomes.

Keywords: intertemporal choice, temporal discounting, framing, affect

Suggested Citation

Hardisty, David J. and Weber, Elke U., Kisses vs. Shocks: Contemplation Asymmetries (Partly) Explain Why Negative Events are Discounted Less than Positive Events (July 1, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1961370 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1961370

Elke U. Weber

Princeton University - Department of Psychology

Green Hall
Princeton, NJ 08540
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
138
Abstract Views
1,351
rank
239,443
PlumX Metrics