From Marketing Mix to E-Marketing Mix: A Literature Overview and Classification

International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 4, No. 9, pp. 17-24, 2009

7 Pages Posted: 20 Nov 2011 Last revised: 26 May 2012

Date Written: September 19, 2009

Abstract

The marketing mix paradigm, in its famous version of the 4Ps, went all the way through the evolution of marketing theory: from the marketing concept, through relationship marketing, to digital economy, being object of discussion both in academic literature and managerial practice. If it is a fact that the 4Ps marketing mix is a milestone of marketing theory, it is also true that the evolution of business contexts has created, in many fields, the need to review the "controllable factors" which form the marketing mix. The digital business represents the more recent of the business contexts and the one with the greater needs of differentiation of the mix. Throughout this evolutionary process, researchers have always been divided between the "conservatives," who think the 4Ps paradigm is able to adapt to the environmental changes by including new elements inside each "P," and the "revisionists," who affirm that the 4Ps paradigm is obsolete and propose new paradigms. This paper aims to clarify these two different approaches to marketing mix evolution through a review of the main literature on e-marketing mix, focusing on the development of marketing mix theory for the digital context.

Keywords: E-marketing, Marketing mix, E-marketing mix

JEL Classification: M31

Suggested Citation

Dominici, Gandolfo, From Marketing Mix to E-Marketing Mix: A Literature Overview and Classification (September 19, 2009). International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 4, No. 9, pp. 17-24, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1961974

Gandolfo Dominici (Contact Author)

University of Palermo - d/SEAS ( email )

Viale delle Scienze, edificio 13
Palermo, 90124
Italy

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
33,465
Abstract Views
76,353
Rank
126
PlumX Metrics