Non-Executive Employee Stock Options and Corporate Innovation

50 Pages Posted: 21 Nov 2011 Last revised: 6 Sep 2017

See all articles by Xin Chang

Xin Chang

Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University

Kangkang Fu

Hong Kong Baptist University

Angie Low

Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University

Wenrui Zhang

Colorado State University, Fort Collins - Department of Finance & Real Estate

Date Written: August 1, 2014

Abstract

We provide empirical evidence on the positive effect of non-executive employee stock options on corporate innovation. The positive effect is more pronounced when employees are more important for innovation, when free-riding among employees is weaker, when options are granted broadly to most employees, when the average expiration period of options is longer, and when employee stock ownership is lower. Further analysis reveals that employee stock options foster innovation mainly through the risk-taking incentive, rather than the performance-based incentive created by stock options.

Keywords: Employee Stock Options; Corporate Innovation; Risk-taking Incentives; Employee Compensation

JEL Classification: J33, M52, O31

Suggested Citation

Chang, Xin and Fu, Kangkang and Low, Angie and Zhang, Wenrui, Non-Executive Employee Stock Options and Corporate Innovation (August 1, 2014). Journal of Financial Economics (JFE), Vol. 115, No. 1, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1962408 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1962408

Xin Chang

Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University ( email )

Singapore, 639798
Singapore

HOME PAGE: https://personal.ntu.edu.sg/changxin/

Kangkang Fu

Hong Kong Baptist University ( email )

34 Renfrew Road
Wing Lung Bank Building for Business
Hong Kong
Hong Kong

Angie Low

Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University ( email )

Singapore, 639798
Singapore

Wenrui Zhang (Contact Author)

Colorado State University, Fort Collins - Department of Finance & Real Estate ( email )

Fort Collins, CO 80523
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,062
Abstract Views
7,175
Rank
38,922
PlumX Metrics