Empirische Ex-Post Evaluation Wettbewerbspolitischer Entscheidungen: Methodische Anmerkungen (Empirical Ex-Post Evaluation of Competition Policy Decisions: Methodological Remarks)

30 Pages Posted: 23 Nov 2011

Date Written: November 19, 2011

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative analysis of methods for the empirical ex post evaluation of merger control decisions. It develops a competition-policy oriented framework of assessment criteria for the leading evaluation methods and applies them to structural modeling and simulation, differences-in-differences methods, event studies as well as survey-based methods. It concludes that a method-mix is recommendable, however, under the exclusion of event studies that fail to secure a minimum level of reliability regarding the evaluation results. Furthermore, it warns against overly optimistic expectations about the effects of systematic impact evaluations of merger decisions.

Note: Downloadable document is in German.

Keywords: empirical methods of industrial organization, merger control, competition policy, antitrust decisions, comparative analysis

JEL Classification: C18, C54, L41, L40, K21

Suggested Citation

Budzinski, Oliver, Empirische Ex-Post Evaluation Wettbewerbspolitischer Entscheidungen: Methodische Anmerkungen (Empirical Ex-Post Evaluation of Competition Policy Decisions: Methodological Remarks) (November 19, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1963285 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1963285

Oliver Budzinski (Contact Author)

Ilmenau University of Technology ( email )

Ilmenau, D-98684
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/wth

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
409
rank
367,464
PlumX Metrics