Afterthoughts on Snyder v. Phelps
3 Pages Posted: 23 Nov 2011
Date Written: November, 22 2011
From a scholarly and professional perspective, the Supreme Court’s decision in Snyder v. Phelps added little to the development of free speech doctrine. As a normative matter, the Court’s role in the resolution of this case is hard to justify or explain.
In this short piece, we reflect on the normative costs of the Court’s decision and raise additional constitutional questions not addressed by the Court in its decision.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Amar, Vikram D. and Brownstein, Alan Edward, Afterthoughts on Snyder v. Phelps (November, 22 2011). Cardozo Law Review de novo, p. 43, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1963394
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.