Afterthoughts on Snyder v. Phelps

3 Pages Posted: 23 Nov 2011

See all articles by Vikram D. Amar

Vikram D. Amar

University of Illinois College of Law

Alan E. Brownstein

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Date Written: November, 22 2011

Abstract

From a scholarly and professional perspective, the Supreme Court’s decision in Snyder v. Phelps added little to the development of free speech doctrine. As a normative matter, the Court’s role in the resolution of this case is hard to justify or explain.

In this short piece, we reflect on the normative costs of the Court’s decision and raise additional constitutional questions not addressed by the Court in its decision.

Suggested Citation

Amar, Vikram D. and Brownstein, Alan Edward, Afterthoughts on Snyder v. Phelps (November, 22 2011). Cardozo Law Review de novo, p. 43, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1963394

Vikram D. Amar (Contact Author)

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Alan Edward Brownstein

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States
530-752-2586 (Phone)
530-752-4704 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
167
rank
168,600
Abstract Views
713
PlumX Metrics