51 Pages Posted: 4 Dec 2011 Last revised: 2 Jan 2012
Date Written: November 24, 2011
This article looks at McDonald’s, impact on public policy, and tort law from historical and social psychology perspectives, following McDonald’s from its beginnings in the mid-1950’s through today. By examining McDonald’s Corp. v. Steel and Morris (McLibel), Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants (Hot Coffee), and Pelman v. McDonald’s Corp. (Childhood Obesity), I demonstrate that certain tort cases involving McDonald’s have had particularly important social and legal consequences that I attribute to McDonald’s special influence over the human psyche, beginning in childhood. In explaining McDonald’s extraordinary power over the public imagination and how this affects lawsuits involving it, I rely on the social psychology approach called situationism that recognizes the strong effect that environmental influences can have on individual decision-making. I conclude that lawsuits involving McDonald’s have had and will continue to have important social and legal consequences because of the unique role this corporation plays in our lives.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Forell, Caroline Anne, McTorts: The Social and Legal Impact of McDonald's Role in Tort Suits (November 24, 2011). Loyola Consumer Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, p. 101, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1964380