Three Fallacies of Contemporary Jurisprudence

37 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2011  

Date Written: November 29, 1985

Abstract

Modern legal thought overlooks basic religious questions about the authority, purpose and limits of law. These questions are fundamental to a proper jurisprudential study, yet are routinely ignored. This paper addresses the three basic fallacies that have developed from the failure of legal scholars to examine the religious foundations of the law, and suggests a reordering of basic legal theory in line with this new thinking.

Keywords: jurisprudence, religion, law and religion, theology, legal theory, human nature

Suggested Citation

Alexander, Frank S., Three Fallacies of Contemporary Jurisprudence (November 29, 1985). Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1985. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1965551

Frank S. Alexander (Contact Author)

Emory Law ( email )

1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Rank
319,047
Abstract Views
368