The Problem of Subsidies as a Means of Protectionism: Lessons from the WTO EC — Aircraft Case

28 Pages Posted: 2 Dec 2011

Date Written: November 30, 2011

Abstract

In this article, I examine the problem of subsidies in international trade. In this regard, I consider that a possible purpose of international regulation of subsidies is to fight protectionist subsidies, as opposed to subsidies used for other goals. With this purpose in mind, I then consider whether the SCM Agreement can be said to reflect this purpose. I also discuss whether the interpretations of the SCM Agreement in the EC — Aircraft dispute provide any insights on this issue. The dispute involved alleged subsidies to the aircraft maker Airbus by the European Union and certain member state governments, and has been one of the highest profile and most commercially significant disputes in the history of the WTO. The issues in the case were extensively argued by two of the leading WTO members, and thus its findings on these issues are particularly significant. Reviewing the EC — Aircraft Panel and Appellate Body findings on a number of specific legal issues, I conclude that a case can be made that the SCM Agreement and the EC — Aircraft dispute reflect an underlying purpose of the SCM Agreement of fighting protectionism.

Keywords: WTO, Subsidies

Suggested Citation

Lester, Simon, The Problem of Subsidies as a Means of Protectionism: Lessons from the WTO EC — Aircraft Case (November 30, 2011). Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1966786 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1966786

Simon Lester (Contact Author)

Cato Institute ( email )

1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-5403
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
538
Abstract Views
2,576
rank
49,770
PlumX Metrics