Hyde V Hyde: Defining or Defending Marriage?

15 Pages Posted: 1 Dec 2011

See all articles by Rebecca Probert

Rebecca Probert

University of Warwick - School of Law

Date Written: December 1, 2011

Abstract

Lord Penzance’s description of marriage in Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee has often been cited as the legal definition of marriage, and has been relied on to deny marital status to a number of unions, most recently in Wilkinson v Kitzinger. Yet his words were shaped by their historical context and were not immediately regarded as defining marriage. Nor have they been taken literally in all contexts: when considering the availability of divorce, the courts have not insisted that a marriage be ‘for life’, nor has recognition been denied to non-Christian’ marriages. This article argues that Lord Penzance’s description should be understood as a defense, rather than as a definition, of marriage, and that modern judges are not constrained by it, and should not continue to invoke it.

Keywords: child law, family law, marriage, marital status, divorce, Christianity

Suggested Citation

Probert, Rebecca, Hyde V Hyde: Defining or Defending Marriage? (December 1, 2011). Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 322-336, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1966989

Rebecca Probert (Contact Author)

University of Warwick - School of Law ( email )

Gibbet Hill Road
Coventry CV4 7AL, CV4 7AL
United Kingdom
02476 524484 (Phone)
02476 524105 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/staff/academic/probert

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
18
Abstract Views
6,578
PlumX Metrics