Construction or Reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law

Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Paper, Forthcoming

MAASTRICHT EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW INSTITUTE WORKING PAPER No. 2011/37

23 Pages Posted: 7 Dec 2011

See all articles by Jaap Hage

Jaap Hage

Maastricht University - METRO Institute

Date Written: December 6, 2011

Abstract

This paper discusses the viability of legal constructivism, the view that the legal consequences of a case are what the best legal argument says they are. Legal constructivism is opposed to re-constructivism, the view that legal arguments merely aim at establishing what the independently existing legal consequences are. It is first argued that legal constructivism is at best a view that can neither be verified nor falsified, and that legal arguments are what really matters. The argument continues with a discussion of ontological constructivism, the view that the legal consequences depend on the best possible legal argument. It is argued that ontological constructivism does not make sense in the law, because it presupposes a closed domain, while the law is an open domain. The paper closes with a discussion of procedural constructivism, the view that the legal consequences are determined by the best actual legal argument. This is the most attractive view, not in the least because its alternatives cannot well be defended. The most important objection against this view, that the best actual argument may lead to a wrong conclusion, is rejected because it presupposes that the legal consequences were already there.

Keywords: legal argumentation, constructivism, easy cases, hard cases, institutional theory of law, one right answer, Dworkin, law as open domain, Erlanger Schule

Suggested Citation

Hage, Jaap, Construction or Reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law (December 6, 2011). MAASTRICHT EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW INSTITUTE WORKING PAPER No. 2011/37. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1968976 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1968976

Jaap Hage (Contact Author)

Maastricht University - METRO Institute ( email )

PO Box 616
Maastricht, 6200 MD
Netherlands

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
139
rank
204,201
Abstract Views
761
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information