Addressing the Global Climate Change Problem in GATT/WTO Law: The Vision of a New International Climate Law Based on International Distributive Justice

Journal of World Investment and Trade, Vol. 12, No. 5, October 2011

40 Pages Posted: 8 Dec 2011 Last revised: 5 Nov 2013

See all articles by A. F. M. Maniruzzaman

A. F. M. Maniruzzaman

University of Portsmouth - School of Law; Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, University of Dundee; Faculty of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law

Ahmad S.A.S. Al-Tayer

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: October 1, 2011

Abstract

‘International distribution justice’, not ‘most favored nation’ (MFN), is the appropriate core principle to govern a law of obligations such as that of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The international distributive justice principle delivers opportunity for economic development because it observes the ‘differences’ principle that characterizes distributive justice, whereas the MFN principle does not, for it distributes obligations erga omnes partes. On the international distributive justice model, obligations are distributed in accordance with WTO member countries’ capacities to bear them. The distribution metric is simple: the degrees of obligation to observe WTO law should range from ‘nil’ to ‘absolute’ along the range of ‘least-developed’, ‘developing’ and ‘developed’ countries. The rank ordering of countries should occur on the basis of their gross domestic product (GDP) status alone, for that status is sufficiently indicative of every country’s economic condition. Accordingly, the current WTO sense of ‘least-developed’, ‘developing’ and ‘developed’ countries should be abandoned in favor of their distinction in terms of their GDP status. Quite properly, there is global interest in the development of a climate law that will deliver the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The core principle of that law must also be international distributive justice, in order that there be an equitable distribution of the cost burden of GHG reduction. The concept of international distributive justice is discernible in the ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’ doctrine of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), but there is no clear relationship between MEAs and the WTO/GATT legislative scheme. A new climate law securely based on the international distributive justice principle will determine that relationship once it is also the core principle of WTO law. Then only the legislative power of the United Nations is required to give the new climate law a coercive power that obliges all GHG emitters.

Keywords: GATT/WTO Law, International Economic Law, International Climate Law, Climate Change, Developing Countries, International Distributive Justice

JEL Classification: K3, K33

Suggested Citation

Maniruzzaman, A. F. M. and Al-Tayer, Ahmad S.A.S., Addressing the Global Climate Change Problem in GATT/WTO Law: The Vision of a New International Climate Law Based on International Distributive Justice (October 1, 2011). Journal of World Investment and Trade, Vol. 12, No. 5, October 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1969845 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1969845

A. F. M. Maniruzzaman (Contact Author)

University of Portsmouth - School of Law ( email )

Richmond Building
Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 3DE
United Kingdom
+44 (0)2392844194 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.port.ac.uk/departments/academic/law/staff/title,23599,en.html

Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, University of Dundee ( email )

Nethergate
Dundee, Scotland DD1 4HN
United Kingdom

Faculty of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law ( email )

Beijing
China

HOME PAGE: http://www.cupl.edu.cn:81/sites/en/School_EN_new_Index.jsp

Ahmad S.A.S. Al-Tayer

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
116
Abstract Views
642
rank
240,801
PlumX Metrics