An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure: Reframing the Debate About Law School Affirmative Action
17 Pages
Posted: 9 Dec 2011
University of Memphis - Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law
Date Written: 2010
Abstract
Written as an invited response to Prof. Richard Sander’s “Class in American Legal Education,” this piece argues that the debate about affirmative action in higher education has overemphasized the admissions process without focusing a sufficient amount of energy on addressing longer-term strategies that would make controversial admissions interventions unnecessary.
Suggested Citation:
Suggested Citation
Kiel, Daniel, An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure: Reframing the Debate About Law School Affirmative Action (2010). Denver University Law Review, Vol. 88, p. 791, 2010; University of Memphis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 111. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1970014
