Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Constitutional Remedies for Underinclusive Statutes: A Critical Appraisal of Heckler v. Mathews

73 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2011 Last revised: 28 Dec 2011

Bruce K. Miller

Western New England University School of Law

Date Written: 1985

Abstract

The power of the federal courts to remedy injuries caused by constitutional violations is a fundamental assumption of our constitutional scheme. The Supreme Court's equal protection decisions of the past generation illustrate the extent to which we take this power completely for granted. When confronted with a statute that denies a litigant's fifth or fourteenth amendment right to equal treatment, the Court has rarely limited itself to a simple declaration that the statute is unconstitutional. Such declarations, rather, have been routinely accompanied by awards of often substantial relief to the persons injured by the unconstitutional inequality. The author analyzes Heckler v. Matthews as it informs this area of law.

Keywords: constitutional law, federal courts, statutes

Suggested Citation

Miller, Bruce K., Constitutional Remedies for Underinclusive Statutes: A Critical Appraisal of Heckler v. Mathews (1985). Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL), Vol. 20, p. 79, 1985. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1972434

Bruce K. Miller (Contact Author)

Western New England University School of Law ( email )

1215 Wilbraham Road
Springfield, MA 01119
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
365