Subnational Appointments in Authoritarian Regimes: Evidence from Russian Gubernatorial Appointments
37 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2011 Last revised: 16 May 2012
Date Written: December 15, 2011
Abstract
Elections are among the most important and least understood institutions in contemporary authoritarian regimes. Theoretically, electoral authoritarian regimes should have an informational advantage that makes them more robust than other types of authoritarian regimes, but much empirical evidence suggests otherwise. In this paper we offer a new perspective on why this might be the case. Specifically, we consider how authoritarian elections influence a ruler’s choices in making cadre appointments. We argue that the imperative of winning authoritarian elections forces authoritarian leaders to prioritize the appointment of politically loyal cadres, who can help the regime win elections. This choice often comes at the expense of appointing officials who are competent at making good public policy and promoting economic development, factors that may contribute to long-term regime stability. We test this theory using an original dataset of gubernatorial appointments in one leading contemporary authoritarian regime, Russia.
Keywords: Russia, authoritarian regimes, elections, United Russia, bureaucrats, appointments
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships
By Carles Boix and Milan Svolik
-
By Scott Gehlbach and Philip Keefer
-
Power-Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes
By Milan Svolik
-
Dictators and Their Viziers: Endogenizing the Loyalty-Competence Trade-Off
By Georgy Egorov and Konstantin Sonin
-
Inequality and Democratization
By Ben W. Ansell and David J. Samuels
-
Authoritarian Elections and Leadership Succession, 1975-2004
By Gary W. Cox
-
By Susan D. Hyde and Nikolay Marinov
-
Policy Uncertainty in Hybrid Regimes - Evidence from Firm Level Surveys
By Thomas Kenyon and Megumi Naoi