Do Perceptions of Ballot Secrecy Influence Turnout? Results from a Field Experiment
40 Pages Posted: 17 Dec 2011 Last revised: 17 Apr 2022
Date Written: December 2011
Abstract
Although the secret ballot has long been secured as a legal matter in the United States, formal secrecy protections are not equivalent to convincing citizens that they may vote privately and without fear of reprisal. We present survey evidence that those who have not previously voted are particularly likely to voice doubts about the secrecy of the voting process. We then report results from a field experiment where we provided registered voters with information about ballot secrecy protections prior to the 2010 general election. We find that these letters increased turnout for registered citizens without records of previous turnout, but did not appear to influence the behavior of citizens who had previously voted. These results suggest that although the secret ballot is a long-standing institution in the United States, providing basic information about ballot secrecy can affect the decision to participate to an important degree.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Hey Look at Me: The Effect of Giving Circles on Giving
By Dean S. Karlan and Margaret Mcconnell
-
Hey Look at Me: The Effect of Giving Circles on Giving
By Dean S. Karlan and Margaret Mcconnell
-
How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People’s Donations to Fund Public Goods?
By Dean S. Karlan and John A. List
-
How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People's Donations to Fund Public Goods?
By Dean S. Karlan and John A. List
-
How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People's Donations to Fund Public Goods?
By Dean S. Karlan and John A. List
-
How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People’s Donations to Fund Public Goods?
By Dean S. Karlan and John A. List
-
Taxes on the Internet: Deterrence Effects of Public Disclosure
By Joel B. Slemrod, Thor O. Thoresen, ...