Party Primaries for Candidate Selection? Right Question, Wrong Answer

University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 964-983, 2011

University of Queensland TC Beirne School of Law Research Paper No. 12-1

20 Pages Posted: 24 Dec 2011

See all articles by Graeme D. Orr

Graeme D. Orr

The University of Queensland - T.C. Beirne School of Law

Date Written: December, 21 2011

Abstract

Moves to adapt the US primary system for candidate selection are afoot in the common law world, against a backdrop of political malaise. This paper critically explores the genesis of this development and different models of adaptation. It contrasts the legal and social conception of a membership-based party in the common law tradtion, with the weak, US model of a political party, where 'membership' is transitory, transactionalised and public.

Problems with primaries are ultimately not ones of legal, let alone constitutional, form or limits. They are problems in the (mis)matching of ends and means in the design of political institutions. The primary is a paradoxical method to appeal to if the goal is to reinvigorate parties.

Keywords: Political Parties, Candidate Selection, Electoral Law, Constitutional Law, Freedom of Association

Suggested Citation

Orr, Graeme, Party Primaries for Candidate Selection? Right Question, Wrong Answer (December, 21 2011). University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 964-983, 2011, University of Queensland TC Beirne School of Law Research Paper No. 12-1, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1975611

Graeme Orr (Contact Author)

The University of Queensland - T.C. Beirne School of Law ( email )

The University of Queensland
St Lucia
4072 Brisbane, Queensland 4072
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
60
Abstract Views
451
rank
406,409
PlumX Metrics