Inducing Natural Group Identity: A RDP Analysis
13 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2012
Date Written: January 3, 2012
Abstract
A relevance, distinctiveness and plausibility (RDP) analysis is a conceptual framework that can be used to identify when potential confounds are a problem for interpreting experimental results. We illustrate this analysis using the creation or enhancement of natural group identity by the means of priming manipulations as employed in the experiments of five target papers. Such priming manipulations may lead to experimenter demand effects and may spuriously induce behavior change. Using a RDP analysis, we show how these potential confounds are likely to be problematic for all but one of the target papers.
Keywords: confounds, objectives, economic experiments, group identity, natural groups, priming
JEL Classification: B41, C90, D03
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Costs of Deception: Evidence from Psychology
By Andreas Ortmann and Ralph Hertwig
-
The Costs of Deception: Evidence from Psychology
By Andreas Ortmann and Ralph Hertwig
-
By John Duffy and Eric O'neill Fisher
-
Which is the More Predictable Gender? Public Good Contribution and Personality
By Marco Perugini, Jonathan H. W. Tan, ...
-
Identifying Altruism in the Laboratory
By Glenn W. Harrison and Laurie Johnson
-
Correlated Equilibria, Good and Bad: An Experimental Study
By John Duffy and Nick Feltovich
-
Giving in Dictator Games: Regard for Others or Regard by Others?