Tenure: A Conscientious Objective

2 Pages Posted: 4 Jan 2012

See all articles by William W. Van Alstyne

William W. Van Alstyne

Duke University School of Law; William & Mary Law School

Date Written: January 4, 2012

Abstract

This critical response to James O'Toole's "Tenure: A Conscientious Objection" argues that O'Toole's argument that the tenure system is unnecessary under due process subverts the purpose of tenure elimination, that is, a healthy rate of teacher turnover.

Keywords: tenure, professor, university

Suggested Citation

Van Alstyne, William W. and Van Alstyne, William W., Tenure: A Conscientious Objective (January 4, 2012). Change Magazine, p. 37, 1994, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-195, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1979443

William W. Van Alstyne (Contact Author)

William & Mary Law School ( email )

South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States

Duke University School of Law ( email )

210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
685
PlumX Metrics