Cities, Redistribution, and Authoritarian Regime Survival
Journal of Politics, pp. 1-14, 2013
14 Pages Posted: 7 Jan 2012 Last revised: 1 Oct 2013
Date Written: October 27, 2011
Abstract
How does redistributive policy affect the survival of authoritarian regimes? I argue that redistributive policy in favor of cities, while a temporary measure reducing urban grievances, in the long-run undermines regime survival by inducing urban concentration. I test the argument using cross-national city population, urban bias, and non-democratic regime survival data in the post-WWII period. The results show that urban concentration is dangerous for dictators principally by promoting collective action, that urban bias induces urban concentration, and that urban bias represents a Faustian bargain with short-term benefits overwhelmed by long-term costs.
Keywords: authoritarian regimes, redistributive politics, cities, urban bias, development
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion Under Dictatorships
By Jennifer Gandhi and Adam Przeworski
-
The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships
By Carles Boix and Milan Svolik
-
By Scott Gehlbach and Philip Keefer
-
Power-Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes
By Milan Svolik
-
Dictators and Their Viziers: Endogenizing the Loyalty-Competence Trade-Off
By Georgy Egorov and Konstantin Sonin
-
Inequality and Democratization
By Ben W. Ansell and David J. Samuels
-
Authoritarian Elections and Leadership Succession, 1975-2004
By Gary W. Cox
-
By Susan D. Hyde and Nikolay Marinov
-
The Logic of Authoritarian Bargains
By Raj M. Desai, Anders Olofsgård, ...
-
Policy Uncertainty in Hybrid Regimes - Evidence from Firm Level Surveys
By Thomas Kenyon and Megumi Naoi