No Longer Presumed Guilty: The Impact of Fundamental Rights on Certain Dogmas of EU Competition Law

40 Pages Posted: 25 Jan 2012 Last revised: 24 Oct 2012

See all articles by Marco Bronckers

Marco Bronckers

Leiden University - Leiden Law School

Anne Vallery

VVGB Advocaten/Avocats, Brussels

Date Written: January 10, 2012

Abstract

That the penalties imposed under EU competition law amount to criminal sanctions within the meaning of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights has been settled for some time. Yet whether the entry into force in December 2009 of the Charter on Fundamental Rights (as part of the Lisbon Treaty), and the EU’s intended accession to the European Convention on Human Rights, should bring about changes in the operation of EU competition law is a question frequently debated now. Most of that debate has focused on the institutional make-up of competition law enforcement in the EU, notably on whether the European Commission ought to adapt its multiple roles of being simultaneously investigator, prosecutor, adjudicator and policy maker; its practices relating to dawn raids, etc. This article takes a different tack and calls attention to the potential impact of fundamental rights on certain procedural or even substantive concepts in EU competition law. For many years now, the Commission has used presumptions to ease its administrative burden in bringing competition law cases. These presumptions have weighed heavily on defendant companies. This article submits that such administrative presumptions need to be curtailed in order to avoid conflicts with the fundamental presumption of innocence and the attendant rights of the defense. We will illustrate this thesis by reference to the presumptions inherent in the parental liability for anti-competitive conduct of subsidiaries, and in the infringement attributed to the exchange of future price information between competitors.

Keywords: EU competition law, European Convention on Human Rights, Charter on Fundamental Rights, presumption of innocence, parental-liability presumption, information exchange, criminal sanctions, Lisbon Treaty

JEL Classification: D40, D42, K21, K42, L4, L40, L49

Suggested Citation

Bronckers, Marco and Vallery, Anne, No Longer Presumed Guilty: The Impact of Fundamental Rights on Certain Dogmas of EU Competition Law (January 10, 2012). World Competition: Law and Economics Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1982579

Marco Bronckers (Contact Author)

Leiden University - Leiden Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 9520
2300 RA Leiden, NL-2300RA
Netherlands

Anne Vallery

VVGB Advocaten/Avocats, Brussels ( email )

13 Place Des Barricades
Vesalius Building, Barricadenplein
Brussels, 1000
Belgium

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
584
Abstract Views
2,510
rank
50,298
PlumX Metrics