Ecology of the Modern Institutional Spot FX: The EBS Market in 2011

28 Pages Posted: 13 Jan 2012

See all articles by Anatoly B. Schmidt

Anatoly B. Schmidt

Kensho Technologies; Financial Risk and Engineering, NYU School of Engineering

Date Written: January 12, 2012

Abstract

The EBS market has two access methods for its customers: GUI-based access for manual traders (MT) and automated interface (AI). In this work we offer taxonomy of the AI customers in terms of average daily order number: ‘slow’ AI (those AI that do not trade more than MT), high-frequency trading (HFT) firms, and ultra-HFT (those professional trading firms that trade more than the bank AI). Liquidity of the EBS market is characterized with two measures: percentage of time with two-sided market (PTTSM) and the bid/offer spread. The main focus of this work is on the EBS market liquidity during the intervention by the Bank of Japan on 4-Aug-2011 and intervention by the Swiss National Bank on 6-Sep-2011. Generally MT and HFT have the highest PTTSM, and HFT provide the tightest bid/ask spread. It is suggested that HFT determine the FX market volatility rather than just affect it.

Keywords: FX, high-frequency trading, market microstructure

Suggested Citation

Schmidt, Anatoly B., Ecology of the Modern Institutional Spot FX: The EBS Market in 2011 (January 12, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1984070 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1984070

Anatoly B. Schmidt (Contact Author)

Kensho Technologies ( email )

World Trade Center, Suite 46J
NYC, NY 10007
United States

Financial Risk and Engineering, NYU School of Engineering

NY
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
364
rank
75,668
Abstract Views
1,381
PlumX