'Publicness' in Contemporary Securities Regulation after the JOBS Act

51 Pages Posted: 14 Jan 2012 Last revised: 14 Feb 2013

See all articles by Donald C. Langevoort

Donald C. Langevoort

Georgetown University Law Center

Robert B. Thompson

Georgetown University Law Center

Date Written: January 13, 2012


The JOBS Act of 2012 reflects the largest deregulatory change to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 over its more than 75 year history. It contracts the coverage of those companies subject to the obligations of ‘publicness' and it introduces an 'on ramp' that will permit most newly-public companies to meet a lesser set of disclosure, internal control and governance obligations for up to five years. We set these changes against a larger discussion of when a private enterprise should be forced to take on public status in securities regulation, a topic that has been entirely under theorized. We conclude that the change from 500 to 2000 shareholders of record made by the JOBS Act, while entirely clear in its deregulatory thrust, misses a key point: 'record' ownership is an antiquated metric for any measuring of publicness and Congress needs to find a better one, such as public trading. More broadly, we observe that Congress increasingly has defined public obligations in securities regulation less by the traditional touchstone of investor protection and more by ways that our largest companies affect constituencies beyond their investor base. Our boundary-setting thus should include two tiers of public companies with the smaller tier limited to core disclosure and governance obligations. Finally, our review of these boundary questions reveals a larger pattern that ought to inform how we understand securities regulation. Entrepreneurs and their advisors regularly occupy new unregulated space created in the wake of technological change or by gaps in regulation revealed as markets evolve. Government response, seemingly inevitably, is piecemeal and reactive. The result is a regulatory process that is more informal than administrative law theory usually suggests and more opaque than we might want in contemplating regulatory change.

Keywords: securities regulation, disclosure, publicness

JEL Classification: K22, K19, K29

Suggested Citation

Langevoort, Donald C. and Thompson, Robert B., 'Publicness' in Contemporary Securities Regulation after the JOBS Act (January 13, 2012). Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 101, pp. 337-386, 2013; Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-002; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1984686

Donald C. Langevoort (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9832 (Phone)
202-662-9412 (Fax)

Robert B. Thompson

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
(202) 661-6591 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information