Perfecting Criminal Markets

David Michael Jaros

University of Baltimore - School of Law

January 16, 2012

Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming
University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-07

From illicit drugs to human smuggling to prostitution, legislators may actually be perfecting the very criminal markets they seek to destroy. Criminal laws often create new dangers and new criminal opportunities. Criminalizing drugs creates the opportunity to sell fake drugs. Raising the penalties for illegal immigration increases the risk that smugglers will rely on dangerous methods that can injure or kill their human cargo. Banning prostitution increases the underground spread of sexually transmitted disease. Lawmakers traditionally respond to these “second order” problems in predictable fashion — with a new wave of criminalization that imposes additional penalties on fake drug dealers, dangerous human smugglers, and HIV-positive prostitutes.

But what lawmakers fail to recognize is that the criminalization of these second order activities also improves the criminal markets that gave them birth. Criminalizing the sale of fake cocaine improves the market for genuine drugs by reducing users’ risk that they will be sold “bad product.” Those contemplating illegal immigration, less fearful of being injured or killed, will be willing to pay more for assistance across the border. The total quantity of prostitution will rise when the law makes sex for hire safer. In sum, efforts to criminalize and punish second order crimes may, inadvertently, bolster the very criminal markets that legislatures originally sought to eradicate.

This article suggests that the perfection of criminal markets is not just a quirky economic irony. The dynamic relationship between first and second order crimes is relevant to the formation of sound criminal justice policy and it can help explain the rapid expansion of the criminal code and the growing complexity of federal and state sentencing guidelines. Recognizing that criminalization can actually improve black markets may change how people think about criminal law in relation to other forms of regulation and may de-stigmatize policy alternatives that improve public welfare by making illegal activity safer.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: Criminal Law, Law and Economics

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 20, 2012 ; Last revised: October 22, 2012

Suggested Citation

Jaros, David Michael, Perfecting Criminal Markets (January 16, 2012). Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming; University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-07. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1987162 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1987162

Contact Information

David Michael Jaros (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
HOME PAGE: http://law.ubalt.edu/
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,428
Downloads: 237
Download Rank: 101,616