Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Personal Jurisdiction and Product Liability

35 Pages Posted: 20 Jan 2012 Last revised: 17 Dec 2014

Daniel M. Klerman

USC Gould School of Law

Date Written: January 17, 2012

Abstract

This article is the first sustained economic analysis of personal jurisdiction. It argues that plaintiffs should be able to sue where they purchased a product which caused injury. Such a rule allows manufacturers to set prices which take into account the quality of the forum state’s courts. If the courts are biased against out-of-state corporations, have overly generous judges or juries, or apply substantive law which is excessively pro-consumer, manufacturers can, through contracts with distributors and retailers, charge a higher price to consumers in that state. This prevents judges and juries from engaging in inter-state redistribution and gives states an incentive to provide efficient substantive rules and adjudicative institutions. In contrast, a rule which required suit in a place more fully under the control of the defendant – such as the place of manufacture or the location of the distributor – would encourage manufacturers to select inefficiently pro-defendant jurisdictions for their activities. Because consumers are unlikely to know where products are manufactured or distributed and are unlikely to be able to evaluate the quality of the law in those states, it is implausible to think that the market will give manufacturers incentives to locate their jurisdiction-triggering activities in states with efficient laws and institutions. This analysis is particularly important, because the Supreme Court has recently deadlocked on personal jurisdiction in product liability cases.

Keywords: personal jurisdiction, products liability, jurisdictional competition, choice of law

JEL Classification: K40, K13

Suggested Citation

Klerman, Daniel M., Personal Jurisdiction and Product Liability (January 17, 2012). 85 Southern California Law Review 1551-1596 (2012); USC CLASS Research Paper No. C12-2; USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 12-4. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1987223 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1987223

Daniel M. Klerman (Contact Author)

USC Gould School of Law ( email )

699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States
213-740-7973 (Phone)
213-740-5502 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://weblaw.usc.edu/contact/contactInfo.cfm?detailID=227

Paper statistics

Downloads
187
Rank
135,491
Abstract Views
1,153