Texas Law Review See Also, Vol. 90, pp. 97-109, 2012
15 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2012 Last revised: 19 Apr 2012
Date Written: January 17, 2012
Professor Colleen Chien recently developed an innovative and important model that relies on a patent's "after-acquired" characteristics to predict the chances that the patent will be involved in litigation. This comment critiques Professor Chien's model by identifying certain weaknesses, including that its dataset is limited to 1990 patents and its sample size may be too small to be sufficiently representative, as well as a number of endogeneity concerns. Additionally, we seek a more precise definition of data regarding the patent owner, further categorization of reexamination data, and research into the timing of transfer. Finally, we question her policy recommendations given these weaknesses and propose areas of further inquiry.
Keywords: patent litigation, predicting, patent, federal circuit, outcomes, empirical
JEL Classification: O31, O34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Kesan, Jay P. and Schwartz, David L. and Sichelman, Ted M., Paving the Path to Accurately Predicting Legal Outcomes: A Comment on Professor Chien’s Predicting Patent Litigation (January 17, 2012). Texas Law Review See Also, Vol. 90, pp. 97-109, 2012; San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 12-079; Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 11-12; Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LBSS12-09. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1987258