Persistent Poverty in the Netherlands, Germany and the UK

OSA Institute for Labour Studies at Tilburg University Working Paper No. 2000-4

28 Pages Posted: 19 Jan 2012

See all articles by Didier Fouarge

Didier Fouarge

Maastricht University

Ruud Muffels

Tilburg University

Date Written: June 15, 2000


Using panel data for the Netherlands, Germany and the UK for seven years in the late 1980s and early 1990s the paper examines the comparative evidence on longitudinal income and persistent poverty for the three countries. Elaborating on the existing methodological literature of income dynamics, a panel regression model has been estimated to arrive at population wide estimates of the population in persistent and transitory poverty in a comparative perspective. What the model actually pursues is to disentangle income over time in a permanent and transitory part. The idea behind the approach is that what really matters for people’s welfare in the long run is their permanent income. The basic assumption is that people have a kind of latent long-term income-to-needs level from which occasional departures are possible due to temporary income shortfalls or income surpluses associated with the occurrence of events such as (un)employment, disability or illness, overtime work or working time reductions. According to this framework, poverty can be seen as a state in which permanent income falls below a predefined threshold being the long-term poverty line. The approach can therefore be helpful in estimating the size of the population in persistent poverty. When appropriate variables are added to the empirical model, it is possible to monitor the effect of socioeconomic events on the permanent income-to-needs level. Following Esping-Andersen’s seminal work on welfare-state regimes, one might perceive the UK as a liberal welfare state although in a less prototypical sense as it exists in the US. Germany should clearly be considered to belong to the corporatist prototype and the Netherlands to the social-democratic type. Then, presumably, the UK has the lowest permanent income-to-needs level, the highest persistent poverty incidence and the highest income mobility. The findings confirm the presumption that permanent income is lower in a liberal welfare state as the UK although not very much lower than in the other countries. Hence, the transitory part of income is slightly larger in this liberal type of welfare state. The results also show that permanent income is more unequally distributed in the UK than in the Netherlands and Germany and that income inequalities have a less permanent character in the Netherlands. Besides, transitory shocks in income have a less permanent effect in the Netherlands than in the two other countries. The inclusion of household composition or labor market variables does not alter the main results. Viewing the effect of labor market status variables, like living in a household with a not working head, it is shown that members of these households are more likely persistent poor, particularly when the head is female. The effects of household structure on persistent poverty appear quite large. Especially, lone-parents households seem prone to persistent poverty in all three welfare regimes but single elderly particularly in the UK.

Suggested Citation

Fouarge, Didier and Muffels, Ruud, Persistent Poverty in the Netherlands, Germany and the UK (June 15, 2000). OSA Institute for Labour Studies at Tilburg University Working Paper No. 2000-4. Available at SSRN: or

Didier Fouarge (Contact Author)

Maastricht University ( email )

P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, 6200MD

Ruud Muffels

Tilburg University ( email )

Postbus 90153
Tilburg, DC Noord-Brabant 5000 LE
0031134662795 (Phone)
0031134663003 (Fax)


Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics