Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

A New Look at the Debate About the Takeover Directive

Ghent University, Financial Law Institute Working Paper No. 2012-05

21 Pages Posted: 22 Jan 2012 Last revised: 4 Apr 2012

Eddy Wymeersch

Ghent University - Financial Law Institute; ECGI

Date Written: March 23, 2012

Abstract

With a view of the projected revision of the takeover directive, this paper calls attention to some items that would usefully be revised. Especially attention is drawn to the mandatory bid rule, the scope of which should restricted to share acquisitions - and not apply to other control changes, - while company law in general should strictly regulate conflicted transactions, thereby eliminating control premia, and hence the need to proceed to a mandatory bid. Multistate takeover should be reregulated, taking into account the new supervisory structure, esp. ESMA. Also some of the blanks should be filled e.g. on squeeze outs, sell outs, and other specific requirements like “acting in concert”. As to the most controversial item of defensive techniques, a fundamental revision seems unlikely, but one could be considered to allow these techniques, but subject their effectiveness to a qualified vote in the general meeting, the shareholders voting according to the rules applicable before the bid.

Keywords: Takeover bids, ESMA, mandatory bids, control premium, conflicts of interest, defences

JEL Classification: K22, K29

Suggested Citation

Wymeersch, Eddy, A New Look at the Debate About the Takeover Directive (March 23, 2012). Ghent University, Financial Law Institute Working Paper No. 2012-05. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1988927 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1988927

Eddy O. Wymeersch (Contact Author)

Ghent University - Financial Law Institute ( email )

Universiteitstraat 4
Gent, B-9000
Belgium
+32 9 264 68 27 (Phone)
+32 9 264 68 55 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ugent.be/fli

ECGI ( email )

c/o ECARES ULB CP 114
B-1050 Brussels
Belgium

Paper statistics

Downloads
443
Rank
53,462
Abstract Views
1,794