Recent French Decisions on Database Protection: Towards a More Consistent and Compliant Approach with the Court of Justice’s Case Law?

European Journal of Law and Technology, No. 2, 2012

14 Pages Posted: 21 Jan 2012

See all articles by Estelle Derclaye

Estelle Derclaye

University of Nottingham, School of law

Date Written: January 20, 2012

Abstract

Since the official date of implementation of the Database Directive , namely the 1 January 1998, 14 years have now already passed. During this decade and a half, French courts have handed down around 30 decisions on database protection. Between 1998 and 2004, the year when the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its first four parallel rulings on the sui generis right , the French case law on the sui generis right was quite erratic. Admittedly, such state of affairs was not dissimilar in other Member States owing to the sheer novelty of the sui generis right and the vagueness of many of the Database Directive’s provisions. While the sui generis right was meant to replace the tort of slavish copying still existing in many Member States on the continent, French decisions fluctuated between cumulating the two actions and thus repairing the same damage twice, and rejecting the overlap. Since its 2004 rulings, the CJEU handed down two more decisions mainly confirming its case law on infringement and one more is imminent.

Have the French courts adjusted their rulings to follow the CJEU’s precedents since 2004? This comment compares the French case law before its British Horseracing Board and Fixtures Marketing decisions with French case law decided after them and also checks whether these newer French decisions comply with the CJEU case law. The comment focuses on the sui generis right, including the overlap between the latter and slavish copying also known as parasitism. Copyright is left aside mainly because the French criterion of originality and other aspects of the protection by copyright before the implementation were very similar to the Database Directive’s provisions on the matter so that most decisions do not bring about a change in the law.

Keywords: database, sui generis right, unfair competition, parasitism, slavish copying, Europe, France

Suggested Citation

Derclaye, Estelle, Recent French Decisions on Database Protection: Towards a More Consistent and Compliant Approach with the Court of Justice’s Case Law? (January 20, 2012). European Journal of Law and Technology, No. 2, 2012 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1989031

Estelle Derclaye (Contact Author)

University of Nottingham, School of law ( email )

Nottingham NG7 2RD
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/law2/staff/estelle.derclaye

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
110
Abstract Views
924
rank
273,739
PlumX Metrics