7 Pages Posted: 31 Jan 2012
Date Written: January 21, 2012
This short article is a response piece to a case note review of the U.K. Supreme Court judgment in the case of Sienkiewicz v Greif (2011), and seeks to challenge the argument made in the case note that epidemiological evidence, and scientific evidence in general are as a result of the decision reached by the Supreme Court to be considered as having little or no validity in mesothelioma actions.
Keywords: asbestos, mesothelioma, epidemiology, causation, Sienkiewicz, Willmore, supreme court
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Mckenna, Alan, 'Sienkiewicz V Greif (UK) Ltd and Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council: A Material Contribution to Uncertainty?': A Response (January 21, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1989470 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1989470