32 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2012
Date Written: January 16, 2012
This submission discusses implications for the quality and safety of financial markets of proposed rules implementing the market-making provisions of section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act, commonly known as the “Volcker Rule.” The proposed rules1 have been described by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Agencies’ proposed implementation of the Volcker Rule would reduce the quality and capacity of market making services that banks provide to U.S. investors. Investors and issuers of securities would find it more costly to borrow, raise capital, invest, hedge risks, and obtain liquidity for their existing positions. Eventually, non-bank providers of market-making services would fill some or all of the lost market making capacity, but with an unpredictable and potentially adverse impact on the safety and soundness of the financial system. These near-term and longer-run impacts should be considered carefully in the Agencies’ cost-benefit analysis of their final proposed rule. Regulatory capital and liquidity requirements for market making are a more cost effective method of treating the associated systemic risks.
Keywords: market-making, Volcker rule, financial markets, regulatory capital, liquidity requirements, systemic risk
JEL Classification: E42, G21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Duffie, Darrell, Market Making Under the Proposed Volcker Rule (January 16, 2012). Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper No. 106. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1990472 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1990472
By David Skeel
By Andrew Tuch
Under the 'Volcker Rule' in the United States, it is Proposed that Banks Will No Longer Be Allowed to Own, Invest in, or Sponsor Hedge Funds, Private Equity Funds, or Proprietary Trading Operations for Their Own Profit, Unrelated to Serving Their Customers: Can this Be an Effective Regulatory Response to Risk Issues Exposed During the Financial Crisis that Commenced in the Autumn of 2008?
By Ted Harding