Group Buying, Buyer Heterogeneity and Seller’s Bargaining Power

Decision Sciences Journal, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 761-783, 2012

36 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2012 Last revised: 18 Jul 2013

See all articles by Xinxin Li

Xinxin Li

University of Connecticut - Department of Operations & Information Management

Date Written: December 1, 2011

Abstract

Group buying enables collective bargaining opportunity that individual buyers lack to negotiate prices with sellers. This potential negotiation capability has two opposing effects. On the one hand, the prospect of the group being able to negotiate price with its rival forces each seller to lower its price offer, as too high a price will induce the group to give its rival an opportunity to undercut its price via negotiation likely taking away all the buyers. On the other hand, the potential negotiation opportunity may also discourage sellers from competing aggressively in their price offers, as the benefit of charging a low price could be offset by competitors in negotiation, thus yielding overall higher prices for the buyers. In this study, we find that compared to individual purchase, buyers benefit from collective bargaining opportunity by group buying only if sellers’ bargaining power relative to the buyer group is low and/or buyers’ preferences towards the sellers are sufficiently differentiated. Given buyers’ strategic choice of group purchase, sellers may be worse off with a further increase in bargaining power, and so may social welfare.

Keywords: Group Buying, Buyer Heterogeneity, Bargaining Power, Game Theory

JEL Classification: C7, D6, D7, L1

Suggested Citation

Li, Xinxin, Group Buying, Buyer Heterogeneity and Seller’s Bargaining Power (December 1, 2011). Decision Sciences Journal, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 761-783, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1990511

Xinxin Li (Contact Author)

University of Connecticut - Department of Operations & Information Management ( email )

2100A Hillside Rd
Storrs, CT 06269
United States
(860) 486-3062 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
255
Abstract Views
1,649
Rank
220,004
PlumX Metrics