Review of Austrian Economics 25(3) 2012: 263-269
7 Pages Posted: 29 Jan 2012 Last revised: 16 Aug 2014
Date Written: January 27, 2012
Bagus and Howden (2011) argue that price stickiness is a poor justification for advocating a flexible money supply through the issuing of fiduciary media under central or free banking. They view the contraction in output following an exogenous increase in money demand as an optimal response, worry about redistribution effects from the issuance of fiduciary media, and claim a changing money supply complicates economic calculation. Accepting their view that the contraction in output is an optimal response to an exogenous change in money demand, we still find a potentially beneficial role for monetary policy (under central banking) or fractional reserve note issue (under free banking). We show that even if all prices were perfectly flexible, changes in the money supply to offset changes in money demand might still be desirable. We point out several errors and mischaracterizations in their article, justify our decision to disregard wealth transfers, and discuss how a flexible money supply might facilitate economic calculation.
Keywords: Austrian economics, central banking, commodity standard, fiat money, free banking, macroeconomics, money, monetary equilibrium theory, monetary standard, sticky information, sticky prices
JEL Classification: B53, E31, E32, E40, E42, E43, E44, E50, E51, E52
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Luther, William J. and Salter, Alexander William, Monetary Equilibrium and Price Stickiness Reconsidered: A Reply to Bagus and Howden (January 27, 2012). Review of Austrian Economics 25(3) 2012: 263-269. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1993182 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1993182