42 Pages Posted: 31 Jan 2012
Date Written: January 2012
Does information about rampant political corruption increase electoral participation and the support for challenger parties? Democratic theory assumes that offering more information to voters will enhance electoral accountability. However, if there is consistent evidence suggesting that voters punish corrupt incumbents, it is unclear whether this translates into increased support for challengers and higher political participation. We provide experimental evidence that information about copious corruption not only decreases incumbent support in local elections in Mexico, but also decreases voter turnout, challengers' votes, and erodes voters' identification with the party of the corrupt incumbent. Our results suggest that while flows of information are necessary, they may be insufficient to improve political accountability, since voters may respond to information by withdrawing from the political process. We conclude with a discussion of the institutional contexts that could allow increased access to information to promote government accountability.
Keywords: Accountability, Corruption, Elections, Information, Voting
JEL Classification: D72, D73, D82, D83
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Chong, Alberto and De La O, Ana L. and Karlan, Dean S. and Wantchekon, Leonard, Looking Beyond the Incumbent: The Effects of Exposing Corruption on Electoral Outcomes (January 2012). CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP8790. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1995974
This is a CEPR Discussion Paper. CEPR charges a fee of $5.00 for this paper.Login using your CEPR Personal Profile
File name: DP8790.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.