Relational Rights Masquerading as Individual Rights

Posted: 6 Feb 2012

See all articles by Hallie Ludsin

Hallie Ludsin

South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

This article seeks to fill a void in rights theory that permitted Western policy-makers to support the Iraqi and Afghan constitutions despite the risk they posed to women’s rights. Women’s advocacy efforts focused on the danger of discrimination from constitutional protection of religious law, which policymakers stated would be countered by the constitutions’ progressive human rights provisions. The concept of discrimination failed to capture the true depth of harm, which is that religious law may exclude women from the protection of some or all of those human rights provisions. This article proposes expanding the theory of relational rights to simply and clearly explain the process that could render constitutionally protected individual rights meaningless to women in these countries. While the impetus for this article was the drafting of the Iraq and Afghan constitutions, this concept applies beyond these examples to any situation in which a country cedes authority over law or law enforcement to unaccountable non-governmental actors and is not limited to the adoption of religious law.

Suggested Citation

Ludsin, Hallie, Relational Rights Masquerading as Individual Rights (2008). Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 15, p. 195, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1999398

Hallie Ludsin (Contact Author)

South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre ( email )

New Delhi
India

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
265
PlumX Metrics