Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

New Therapies, Old Problems, or, a Plea for Neuromodesty

American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 60, 2012

U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-09

Posted: 10 Feb 2012  

Stephen Morse

University of Pennsylvania Law School

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

This article suggests that investigational deep brain stimulation (DBS) for mental disorders raises few new bioethical issues. Although the scientific basis of the procedure may be both complex and largely unknown, addressing informed consent in such situations is a familiar problem. After reviewing the legal and moral background for investigating DBS and the scientific difficulties DBS faces as a potential treatment for mental disorders, the article focuses on informed consent and makes two primary suggestions. The study of DBS may proceed, but "hyper-disclosure" of the complexities should be required for competent subjects or proper surrogates if the candidate is not competent, and the most rigorous standard for competence should be employed. Throughout, neuromodesty and caution are urged.

Keywords: bioethics, deep-brain stimulation, informed consent, neuroethics, neurological and psychiatric disorders, psychosurgery

Suggested Citation

Morse, Stephen, New Therapies, Old Problems, or, a Plea for Neuromodesty (2012). American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 60, 2012; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-09. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2002089

Stephen J. Morse (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
200
Rank
127,550
Abstract Views
1,218