Federalism Challenges to CERCLA: An Overview

27 Pages Posted: 11 Feb 2012 Last revised: 3 Feb 2013

Date Written: September 17, 2012


When Congress began enacting statutes to govern environmental regulation and natural resources management, it was quite conscious of the United States’s underlying federalism scheme. Nevertheless, parties have challenged the provisions of many such statutes on federalism grounds, presenting Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment arguments, and many of those challenges have been significant (if only rarely successful).

CERCLA, however, has largely avoided federalism challenges to its implementation, especially in the U.S. Supreme Court. After providing a brief overview of how CERCLA works, this article, written in connection with Southwestern Law School's CERCLA Symposium, explores the few federalism challenges to CERCLA that have been raised, focusing on CERCLA’s retroactivity and its federally required commencement date provisions. It concludes with speculations regarding why CERCLA has avoided the federalism scrutiny that other statutes such as the Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act have warranted.

Suggested Citation

Craig, Robin Kundis, Federalism Challenges to CERCLA: An Overview (September 17, 2012). 41 Southwestern University Law Review 617-643 (2012), FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 574, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2003112

Robin Kundis Craig (Contact Author)

USC Gould School of Law ( email )

699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics