HAYEK AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS, Roger Frantz, Robert Leeson, eds., Palgrave-MacMillan, Forthcoming
20 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2012 Last revised: 6 Oct 2015
Date Written: February 13, 2012
Behavioral economics has made its mark by bringing under intense scrutiny the limitations of individuals’ cognitive abilities. The conclusions of such inquiries call into question results from standard economic modeling dependent on assumptions of strong epistemic rationality. Most conspicuously, behavioral economists have introduced a host of new potential causes for market failures. F. A. Hayek likewise famously questioned the cognitive abilities of real world actors, but drew radically different conclusions. We argue that, for Hayek, market institutions rather than individual agents bear the primary cognitive burden in coordinating economic activity. Gaps in individual rationality thus fail to provide adequate grounds for positing market failures. Vernon Smith’s body of work, with its distinction between ecological and constructivist rationality, provides powerful support for the Hayekian position on which it draws its inspiration.
Keywords: F.A. Hayek, market failure, behavioral economics, invisible hand
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Boettke, Peter J. and Caceres, W. Zachary and Martin, Adam G., Error is Obvious, Coordination is the Puzzle (February 13, 2012). HAYEK AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS, Roger Frantz, Robert Leeson, eds., Palgrave-MacMillan, Forthcoming; GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 12-23. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2004362