Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Councils and All that: Commitment Devices, Signaling Tools or Smokescreens?
34 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2012
Date Written: March 29, 2007
Abstract
Xavier Debrun and Manmohan S. Kumar deal with the impact of institutions on fiscal discipline, first discussing the point in principle: (i) fiscal institutions can work as commitment devices (i.e. tie policymakers’ hands); (ii) they can work as signalling devices (i.e. reduce the information asymmetry between the electorate and policymakers); and (iii) they can be smokescreens. The second part of the paper develops an empirical analysis to test these three hypotheses, referring to descriptive evidence and estimating a multivariate panel model for a large sample of EU countries over the period 1990-2004. The authors use time-varying indices of fiscal rule restrictiveness and coverage. The analysis finds significant support for both commitment and signalling, little for the smokescreen hypothesis.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe
By Jordi Galí and Roberto Perotti
-
Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe
By Jordi Galí and Roberto Perotti
-
Revisiting the Stability and Growth Pact: Grand Design or Internal Adjustment?
By Marco Buti, Sylvester C. W. Eijffinger, ...
-
By Willem H. Buiter and Clemens Grafe
-
By Willem H. Buiter and Clemens Grafe
-
Fiscal Rules: Useful Policy Framework or Unnecessary Ornament?
-
Improving the Sgp Through a Proper Accounting of Public Investment
-
Consumption Smoothing Through Fiscal Policy in OECD and EU Countries
By Adriana Arreaza, Bent E. Sørensen, ...
-
Maastricht's Fiscal Rules at Ten: An Assessment
By Marco Buti and Gabriele Giudice