Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Law and Science of Video Game Violence: What Was Lost in Translation?

60 Pages Posted: 19 Feb 2012 Last revised: 27 Aug 2014

William K. Ford

The John Marshall Law School

Date Written: March 8, 2013

Abstract

There are a variety of challenges to making good use of scientific evidence in the courts, including the challenge of translating scientific evidence into something understandable, accurate, and as complete as necessary for the courts to render a sensible decision. This paper examines the use of scientific evidence in the set of cases involving legislative restrictions on minors’ access to violent video games, an issue that eventually reached the Supreme Court in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (2011). Although some of the typical problems associated with scientific evidence were not present in these cases, the courts, on the whole, still did a mediocre job of assessing the evidence. The video game violence cases reinforce the conclusion that the translation of scientific evidence is a significant challenge for the courts, though the higher quality analysis by the one judge who presided over a trial suggests that courts may better understand scientific evidence when they rely less on lawyers to translate it.

Keywords: scientific evidence, video game violence, Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association

Suggested Citation

Ford, William K., The Law and Science of Video Game Violence: What Was Lost in Translation? (March 8, 2013). Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2007301 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2007301

William K. Ford (Contact Author)

The John Marshall Law School ( email )

315 South Plymouth Court
Chicago, IL 60604
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
158
Rank
157,619
Abstract Views
1,228