The Relative Size of Acquisitions and the Wealth of Acquiring Firms: The Amplification Effect
48 Pages Posted: 20 Feb 2012
Date Written: January 9, 2012
Abstract
This study proposes an argument that reconciles disparate findings on the relation between acquiring firm abnormal returns and the relative size of acquisitions. We argue and show that relative size amplifies acquisition wealth effects, resulting in a positive relation for value-creating, but a negative relation for value-destroying acquisitions. This observation has an important implication for the functional form of acquisition wealth effects models: relative size should be included as an interactive effect and not - as is the norm in the literature - as an additive, main effect. We show that a regression model thus specified provides significantly greater explanatory power.
Keywords: acquisitions, bidder abnormal returns, relative size
JEL Classification: G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers
By Gregor Andrade, Mark L. Mitchell, ...
-
Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions?
By Randall Morck, Andrei Shleifer, ...
-
Stock Market Driven Acquisitions
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
Stock Market Driven Acquisitions
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrent and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover Measures
By Robert Comment and G. William Schwert
-
Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers?
By Paul M. Healy, Krishna Palepu, ...
-
Managerial Performance, Tobin's Q, and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers
By Larry H.p. Lang, Ralph A. Walkling, ...