Sovereignty, Compliance, and the World Trade Organization: Lessons from the History of Supreme Court Review

Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, 1999

Posted: 10 Jan 2000

See all articles by Mark Movsesian

Mark Movsesian

St. John's University School of Law

Abstract

This article explores an episode of American constitutional history and discusses its implications for today's debate on dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization. Just as today's Americans debate the authority of the WTO to declare national laws "invalid" under provisions of international trade treaties, nineteenth-century Americans debated the authority of the Supreme Court to declare state laws invalid under provisions of the United States Constitution. I argue that the nineteenth-century history suggests that today's debate exaggerates the likely impact that WTO rulings will have on member states.

Suggested Citation

Movsesian, Mark, Sovereignty, Compliance, and the World Trade Organization: Lessons from the History of Supreme Court Review. Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, 1999, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=200855

Mark Movsesian (Contact Author)

St. John's University School of Law ( email )

8000 Utopia Parkway
Jamaica, NY 11439
United States
718-990-5650 (Phone)
718-990-2199 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.stjohns.edu/academics/graduate/law/faculty/profiles/Movsesian

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
770
PlumX Metrics