Why Do REIT Returns Poorly Reflect Property Returns? Unrealizable Appreciation Gains Due to Trading Constraints as the Solution to the Short-Term Disparity

Real Estate Economics, Forthcoming

Posted: 22 Feb 2012

See all articles by Tobias Muhlhofer

Tobias Muhlhofer

University of Miami - Department of Finance

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: February 21, 2012

Abstract

This study addresses the short-term disparity between REIT returns and direct property returns, and argues that this phenomenon is due to the trading constraints in the direct property market imposed on REITs (the dealer rule), which render them unable to time markets in order to realize short-term property appreciation profits. This makes REITs primarily a property income investment rather than a full property investment, and explains the observed disparity. Specifically, a REIT investor is consistently exposed to rental cash flows, but is not exposed to property appreciation returns that are not contained in income, that is, cyclical price changes caused by a change in the capitalization rate. I test this hypothesis over a 1978-2009 data sample and find strongly that REIT returns consistently reflect property income returns, but not property appreciation returns. This result makes this study, to my knowledge, the first in the literature to find a consistent link between REIT returns and any portion of direct property returns, even at short time horizons, in the context of a linear factor model. I then set up a natural laboratory to test the trading-constraints explanation by examining the appreciation dependence of different types of REITs, which should be differently affected by the trading constraints. I find that returns to UPREITs, which are less affected by the constraints, have a stronger appreciation dependence than returns to regular REITs. As a robustness check, I also perform a size test and find that large REITs, which are less affected by the constraints, have a stronger appreciation dependence than small REITs. When testing the effects of UPREIT and size characteristics simultaneously, I find a consistent UPREIT effect. I further find that Real Estate Operating Companies (REOCs), which are not subject to trading constraints, show short-term property appreciation dependence. These findings offer strong support for the trading-restrictions explanation.

Keywords: REIT returns, REIT regulations, property returns, UPREITs, portfolio management, dealer rule

Suggested Citation

Muhlhofer, Tobias, Why Do REIT Returns Poorly Reflect Property Returns? Unrealizable Appreciation Gains Due to Trading Constraints as the Solution to the Short-Term Disparity (February 21, 2012). Real Estate Economics, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2008888

Tobias Muhlhofer (Contact Author)

University of Miami - Department of Finance ( email )

P.O. Box 248094
Coral Gables, FL 33124-6552
United States

HOME PAGE: http://tobias.muhlhofer.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
587
PlumX Metrics