12 Pages Posted: 23 Feb 2012
Date Written: March 2012
Robert Alexy has built his original theory of law upon pervasive claims for “necessary” features of law. In this article, I show that Alexy's claims suffer from two difficulties. First, Alexy is never clear about what he means by “necessity.” Second, Alexy writes as if there have been no challenges to claims of conceptual necessity. There have been such challenges and Alexy needs to answer them if his project is to succeed.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Patterson, Dennis, Alexy on Necessity in Law and Morals (March 2012). Ratio Juris, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 47-58, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2009744 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2011.00502.x
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: j-9337.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.