Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Persistent Punishment: User Views of Short Prison Sentences

23 Pages Posted: 28 Feb 2012  

Sarah Armstrong

Glasgow University

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: February 28, 2012

Abstract

Semi-structured interviews were conducted of 22 prisoners to gather information about the characteristic features of short prison sentences. Themes raised in comments included: the frequency and quality of sentences, addiction, family, and penal legitimacy. Most of the participants had extensive experience of prison, and the effects of this played out across sentences and years, accumulating and amplifying impacts. And, despite expressions of guilt and remorse, most participants saw their sentence as unjust, and mainly a reaction to offending history. We conclude by suggesting the need for research to shift focus from evaluating individual penal interventions towards more holistic and narrative accounts that cut across sentences.

Keywords: prison, short-term imprisonment, user voice, penal legitimacy, punishment, Scotland, qualitative methods

Suggested Citation

Armstrong, Sarah, Persistent Punishment: User Views of Short Prison Sentences (February 28, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2012415 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2012415

Sarah Armstrong (Contact Author)

Glasgow University ( email )

Adam Smith Business School
Glasgow, Scotland G12 8LE
United Kingdom

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
Rank
253,127
Abstract Views
531